The procedure of forced execution is a rigorous legal process, regulated by the Civil Procedure Code, aimed at ensuring the fulfillment of obligations established by enforceable titles. When the debtor does not voluntarily comply with their debts, the creditor may request the intervention of the competent authorities for the initiation of enforcement proceedings.
This mechanism is designed to provide creditors with an effective guarantee of debt recovery, while at the same time protecting the fundamental rights of debtors through strict rules and precise deadlines. Understanding the procedural stages, applicable measures such as garnishment or sale of assets, as well as the available remedies, such as contesting the enforcement or challenging the enforceable title, is essential for both parties involved.
By respecting the legal framework, the procedure of forced execution maintains its role as a balanced mechanism: on one hand, it ensures the creditor’s legitimate right to recover the claim, and on the other hand, it guarantees the debtor’s protection against potential abuses or disproportionate measures. Thus, the procedure is not merely a sanction, but also a balance between the interests of both parties, respecting the principles of legality and proportionality.
What is the forced execution procedure?
Forced execution represents the legal mechanism through which the state, via the bailiff, ensures the fulfillment of obligations established by enforceable titles when they are not voluntarily respected. In practice, the creditor has the right to request the application of the enforceable judgment or other enforceable act, while the debtor is obliged to bear the consequences of non-compliance. Through the assistance of an enforcement lawyer, the creditor can initiate the procedure and ensure that recovery of amounts is carried out in accordance with the law.
For the debtor, the law provides defense mechanisms. They may file a challenge to enforcement proceedings if the acts drawn up are considered unlawful or disproportionate, or contest the enforceable title if the act on which the enforcement is based lacks legal validity. In practice, the most common measures are garnishment of bank accounts or salaries, seizure of movable property, or sale of immovable property.
An enforcement lawyer specialized in contesting forced execution has the role of analyzing the acts issued by the bailiff and identifying possible procedural irregularities. Moreover, the debtor may even obtain suspension of enforcement proceedings until a final resolution, by filing a contestation, thus gaining essential time to protect their assets.
The legal framework for enforcement proceedings
To initiate enforcement proceedings against a debtor, the Civil Procedure Code imposes a set of conditions and mandatory steps. First, the creditor must hold a claim that is certain, liquid, and due. A claim is deemed certain if there is an enforceable title attesting the obligation, liquid if its value can be determined, and due if the obligation has reached maturity or the debtor has lost the benefit of payment terms.
The enforceable title is the essential element that allows the commencement of forced execution and may consist of final or provisionally enforceable court judgments, arbitral awards, notarial or European enforceable titles, promissory notes, or other documents recognized by law as having enforceability. Thus, the initiation of the procedure depends on the existence of a valid title granting the creditor the legal right to request enforcement.
A challenge to enforcement proceedings is usually filed with the competent enforcement court. If the targeted assets are immovable or generate income from immovable property located in another jurisdiction, the challenge may be filed with the court corresponding to the location of the property. Where the contestation concerns interpretation or application of an enforceable title, it is filed with the court that issued the enforceable judgment.
The legal deadline for filing a contestation is 15 days from the communication of the enforcement act. Until a final decision is rendered, the debtor may request suspension of enforcement proceedings, either by a separate request or together with the contestation, subject to payment of a bond where required by law. Consultation with an enforcement lawyer helps ensure compliance with deadlines, identifies circumstances where suspension does not require a bond, and determines the necessary amounts, thereby protecting the debtor’s rights until final settlement.
An enforcement lawyer can carefully examine whether all conditions of legality were respected: verifying court approval, compliance with garnishment limits, and avoidance of pursuing exempted property. Prompt intervention is crucial, as it allows immediate correction of irregularities and prevents unlawful or abusive acts from causing irreversible consequences for the debtor. At the same time, the bailiff, as the authority responsible for applying the enforcement measures, must act strictly within the boundaries of the law, ensuring that both creditor’s rights and debtor’s protections are respected.
Debtor’s rights in enforcement proceedings
Even though the debtor is the party against whom enforcement is carried out, the law grants them clear and protected rights, intended to maintain balance between the creditor’s interests and protection of the debtor’s assets. These rights include full information on all measures of forced execution, respect for exempted property, and the right to file a contestation to enforcement proceedings against acts considered unlawful, disproportionate, or abusive.
The debtor may also challenge the enforceable title when the document underlying the forced execution does not meet legal conditions. Additionally, the debtor may request suspension of enforcement measures, arguing imminent risk of serious harm, thereby temporarily protecting their assets against garnishment or seizure until the final resolution of the contestation.
Thus, a contestation is the debtor’s main legal tool to obtain protection against unlawful or abusive enforcement proceedings. It must be correctly filed within the deadline provided by law. An enforcement lawyer can examine enforcement acts, identify irregularities, and request the court to suspend enforcement, ensuring protection of the debtor’s assets until the dispute is definitively resolved.
Procedural steps in forced execution
The procedure of forced execution begins with the creditor’s application to the court for authorization of enforcement proceedings, a fundamental step that confers legality and establishes the procedural framework. Once authorization is granted, the bailiff becomes the authority responsible for applying the measures, starting with the issuance of a summons to the debtor. The summons informs the debtor of the initiation of enforcement and gives them one last opportunity to voluntarily comply before coercive measures such as garnishment or seizure of movable and immovable property are applied.
An enforcement lawyer plays a crucial role throughout the process, explaining each stage and its implications: from the authorization request and summons to communication of acts and actual application of enforcement measures. Moreover, the enforcement lawyer ensures compliance with procedural legality and strict deadlines, since violations may lead to annulment of enforcement acts.
In garnishment cases, institutions such as banks or employers are legally obligated to block the sums indicated by the bailiff and transfer them to the creditor, within the legal limits. These measures directly affect the debtor’s income and financial stability, which is why the law imposes limits to protect minimum subsistence levels. Failure of third parties to comply with garnishment obligations, whether by refusal, delay, or incorrect transfer, may lead to civil or even criminal sanctions, highlighting the strict nature of enforcement proceedings.
Legal remedies against forced execution
Within enforcement proceedings, the debtor’s main remedy is to file a contestation, invoking procedural defects, lack of enforceability of the title, or exceeding legal garnishment limits. Proper formulation of such a challenge requires thorough analysis of the acts issued and the application of measures, making the assistance of an enforcement lawyer essential for building a solid defense.
The debtor may also challenge the enforceable title if the underlying act does not comply with legal requirements. An enforcement lawyer can examine contracts, court judgments, or notarial acts that have been transformed into enforceable titles, identifying valid grounds for their annulment.
If the court admits the contestation, it may annul enforcement acts and even order the return of sums garnished. With the help of an enforcement lawyer, the debtor gains real protection of their assets and has substantial chances of cancelling abusive or unlawful measures, restoring balance between creditor’s rights and the debtor’s asset protection.
Facing Enforcement Challenges in Romania? Let’s Tackle Them Together.
At Pavel, Margarit and Associates Romanian Law Firm, we specialize in enforcement notice appeals and writs of execution in Romania. Our skilled team is ready to guide you through appeals against forced execution with comprehensive, high-quality legal support.
Don’t navigate these challenges alone. Contact Us today for expert assistance tailored to your needs.
Impact of Forced Execution. Preventive Advice
The application of forced execution has direct effects on the debtor’s financial situation. Garnishment of salary or bank accounts reduces immediate liquidity, affecting family stability. An enforcement lawyer can examine whether such measures comply with legal limits and file a contestation to stop abusive deductions.
Personal assets such as housing, vehicles, or valuables may be seized and auctioned publicly, with serious consequences on financial and family stability. By filing a contestation, the debtor can obtain annulment of unlawful measures and protection of their property. With the assistance of an enforcement lawyer, the debtor may seek suspension of enforcement, debt rescheduling, or even annulment of the enforceable title through a challenge.
Prevention remains the best strategy against enforcement proceedings. The safest protection is for the debtor to comply with obligations on time and to negotiate with creditors before they appeal to a bailiff. An enforcement lawyer can provide preventive advice and identify alternative solutions to avoid initiation of enforcement.
If you have received a summons or garnishment notice, quick reaction is essential. Filing a contestation within the legal deadline may halt immediate measures. With an enforcement lawyer, you can negotiate with the creditor through debt rescheduling or judicial settlement, and in cases of questionable enforceable titles, filing a contestation becomes vital to protect your property. Prompt intervention and preventive legal consultation can make the difference between losing assets and preserving financial stability.
Thus, the procedure of forced execution is strictly regulated, with short deadlines, complex procedural acts, and potentially severe effects for the debtor. Whether involving garnishment, seizure, or public auction, the debtor has legal remedies such as contestation of enforcement proceedings or enforceable titles to defend their rights. In such cases, the intervention of an enforcement lawyer is crucial to limit negative effects. In many situations, professional assistance may even lead to restitution of amounts garnished and preservation of assets.
Pavel, Margarit and Associates Law Firm is one of the top law firms in Romania, providing high-quality legal services. The firm’s clients include multinational and domestic companies of great magnitude. In 2025, the law firm’s success stories brought it international recognition from the most prestigious international guides and publications in the field. As a result, Pavel, Margarit and Associates Law Firm ranked 3rd in Romania in the Legal 500’s ranking of business law firms with the most relevant expertise. The law firm is internationally recognized by the IFLR 1000 Financial and Corporate 2025 guide. Additionally, Pavel, Margarit and Associates Law Firm is the only law firm in Romania recommended by the international director of Global Law Experts in London in the Dispute Resolution practice area. All relevant information about Pavel, Margarit and Associates Law Firm can be found on the website www.avocatpavel.com.


